Posted by
dolfinwriter on Saturday, July 18, 2009 7:12:43 AM
What an upside-down, inside-out, up-is-down, right-is-wrong, right-is-left-and-left-is-just-plain-crazy, mixed-up world we live in.
The Left HATES Sarah Palin. They hated her within ten minutes of hearing her name. Even as they said they knew nothing about her, they hated her. They don’t just think she’s wrong. They don’t think she’s just misguided. They HATE her.
This is extremism:
“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right, also for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending them out on a task that is from God. That's what we have to make sure that we're praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God's plan.”
—Gov. Sarah Palin at the Wasilla Assembly of God, 8 June 2008
But this is not:
“No, no, no. Not "God Bless America"; God Damn America!”
—Rev. Jeremiah Wright at the Trinity United Church of Christ, 13 April 2003
This is extremism:
“…but I can do my job there, in developing our natural resources, and doing things like getting the roads paved, and making sure our troopers have their cop cars and their uniforms, their guns, and making sure our public schools are funded. But really, all that stuff doesn't do any good if the people of Alaska's heart isn't right with God.”
—Gov. Sarah Palin
But this is not:
“He is one of the most important voices in the 20th and 21st Century, that’s what I think about him. ... When Louis Farrakhan speaks, it’s like E.F. Hutton speaks: All black America listens.”
—Rev. Jeremiah Wright
This is extremism:
Sarah Palin With Flag Behind Her
But this is not:
Terrorist Bill Ayres Stomping on Flag
I said I wasn’t going to waste my time looking up the Sarah Palin quotes, but I did. The more I looked into it the angrier I became.
If Sarah Palin’s words are extremism, then it follows that these words are extremism, right?
“for I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side.”
—Abraham Lincoln
Are these the “idiotic reasonings of a religious conservative”?
How about this one:
“No human counsel hath devised, nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy.
It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and voice by the whole American people; I do, therefore, invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next as a Day of Thanksgiving and Prayer to our beneficent Father, who dwelleth in the heavens. And I recommend to them that, while offering up the ascriptions justly due to him that, for such singular deliverances and blessings; they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it, as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes, to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility, and union.
In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.” 10-03-1863
—Abraham Lincoln
Was Lincoln a “Bible thumping crazy”? A “religious zombie”? A “Religious wingnut”? A “cyanide laced Kool-Aid drinker”?
How odd that Bill Clinton’s illicit sexual adventures in OUR Oval Office of OUR White House are his own private business, but a Sarah Palin statement made in a house of worship is everybody’s business.
Why is this not a pathetic and disgusting double standard?
But we should be used to the double standards by now, right?
What I found is that the lies about Sarah Palin are more subtle. When Sarah said she didn’t think that was her exact quote, and Charlie Gibson said “Exact words”, if he had an ounce of integrity or honesty, he would have had to say “Well, SOME of them, anyway”.
The quotes were not blatantly altered by inserting words as were the Thomas Jefferson quotes (though leaving out words can have the same effect as adding words). But after taking artistic license with them, the Left wing sources then feed their own interpretations. They can always claim that some of the speech was edited out “for brevity”. Or maybe it’s because Sarah Palin is living and therefore more likely to sue for some form of defamation than long dead Thomas Jefferson.
They twisted Sarah’s statement, which she made IN A CHURCH (no small distinction by the way), into this:
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin told ministry students at her former church that the United States sent troops to fight in the Iraq war on a “task that is from God.”…
The Left wing interpretation is that the Christian wacko Sarah Palin is asserting that the US government sent troops into harm’s way because somebody thought God directed them to.
There is another version that ALSO distorts what she actually said by omitting key words, as follows:
“Our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God,” she said. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that plan is God’s plan.”
Different approach, but has the same effect.
Now read again what she ACTUALLY said—especially note the underlined words that somehow don’t find their way into the versions published in the Left wing news media which were then repeated on the Left wing blogs:
“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right, also for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending them out on a task that is from God. That's what we have to make sure that we're praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God's plan.”
These dishonest news hacks and Leftist bloggers are the same people who every day all day long call Conservatives and Republicans liars.
How weak is your argument when you must lie, and distort facts, and put words in people’s mouths, and omit clarifying words they actually said, and rewrite history to make your point?
Of course those eager to dislike (HATE!) Sarah Palin purely for her politics, those who have an anti-Christian agenda, and those who have an anti-Conservative agenda will hear something completely different and will be quick to attach themselves to anything negative about her, including any of these false interpretations.
And they call Christians religious lemmings?
Since I don’t have an agenda to find reasons to hate Sarah Palin, I hear something completely different even in the falsified versions. I hear nothing in her words that I didn’t hear in a number of churches thirty years ago, and really all my life.
Here just for clarity are the key words along with those that the news media and the Leftist bloggers are leaving out. The bracketed words I have repeated for emphasis as any good grammarian would do to analyze sentence structure.
I Repeat:
Bold = Words the Left wing news media edited out (Yeah, for brevity. Yeah, right.)
[Bracketed] = Words that I repeated for emphasis/clarity as a good grammarian would.
“Pray for our military men and women…”
“[Pray] that our leaders… are sending them [our military men and women] out on a task that is from God.”
“That's what we have to make sure that we're praying for…”
“[pray] that there is a plan…”
“and [pray] that that plan is God's plan.”
Any student of good grammar must agree this is what Palin really meant, and that it is quite different from the liberal hack hatchet job interpretation that Charlie Gibson, the rest of the Left wing news media, and all the Leftie bloggers continue to repeat.
Here are the problems with the Left wing distortions of this quote:
1. She said it in a CHURCH, not in some official government capacity, in City Hall, or even in the Governor’s Mansion.
And in the big picture of our historical heritage, so what if she did?
At what point between Abraham Lincoln and Sarah Palin did people—even elected officials—lose their free speech right to mention God, prayer, or faith, especially in a house of worship (unless that official happens to Barack Hussein Obama)?
At what point between Abraham Lincoln and Sarah Palin did a leader become a fanatic to pray that our nation is doing the right thing in line with God’s will (unless that official happens to Barack Hussein Obama)?
I’d love to hear what Abraham Lincoln would have to say to this current crop of yahoo’s in DC and in the Left wing news media about their anti-Christian extremism.
I submit that anyone who has an issue with Sarah Palin speaking about God and prayer in her hometown church should just start lobbying Congress to remove our right of free speech, and our freedom to worship as we please. Just be honest about what it is you REALLY want.
2. This creative revision changes Palin’s request for prayer that our leaders are sending our troops on a just mission into an assertion that they are on a mission from God and that she knows so because she knows God’s will.
No sane Christian would claim to know God’s will, and I don’t care what any twisted Left-winger or atheist says to the contrary.
THEY DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT.
You might find some wacko who professes to know God’s will, but you can’t swing a dead cat anymore without hitting a couple of wackos…
Cindy Sheehan, Jack Murtha and Code Pink
3. It changes her request for prayer that our troops have been sent on a just mission (“that that plan is God’s plan”), again into an assertion that she knows that the Iraq War is God’s plan.
Sarah Palin simply asked that the congregation pray that our national leaders are sending our military on a just mission.
She asked that the congregation pray that there is a plan. To me, and I believe many of us who actually have a bit of religious training, this simply means pray that it will work out in the end to be a net positive, not only for us, but for the Iraqis, and possibly for the entire world.
She asked that the congregation pray that the plan they are praying for is God’s plan/God’s will.
Period. See the Abraham Lincoln quote again.
4. Every election season the Democrats hold a POLITICAL CAMPAIGN EVENT in some Christian church or another and stand around blathering about their Christian faith.
If the Republicans did that, the Left wing news media would give that church a proctological examination. There would surely be cries about separation of church and state, and there would be cries that the church was violating its tax exempt status.
But when the Democrats do it we get Can o’ Crickets
5. Barack Obama gave pastor Rick Warren an interview in which he said:
“As a starting point, it means I believe in -- that Jesus Christ died for my sins, and that I am redeemed through him. That is a source of strength and sustenance on a daily basis. Yes, I know that I don't walk alone. And I know that if I can get myself out of the way, that I can maybe carry out in some small way what he intends. And it means that those sins that I have on a fairly regular basis, hopefully will be washed away.
But what it also means, I think, is a sense of obligation to embrace not just words, but through deeds, the expectations, I think, that god has for us. And that means thinking about the least of these. It means acting -- well, acting justly, and loving mercy, and walking humbly with our god. And that -- I think trying to apply those lessons on a daily basis, knowing that you're going to fall a little bit short each day, and then being able to kind of take note and saying, well, that didn't quite work out the way I think it should have, but maybe I can get a little bit better. It gives me the confidence to try things, including things like running for president, where you're going to screw up once in a while.”
For the record, this is every word of his answer from the transcript. Any response from the MSM and the Leftie bloggers to an Obama statement that he knows Jesus Christ died for his sins?
How about this?
“And I know that if I can get myself out of the way, that I can maybe carry out in some small way what he intends.”
Or this?
“But what it also means, I think, is a sense of obligation to embrace not just words, but through deeds, the expectations, I think, that god has for us.”
No? Can o’ Crickets
I’m sure our Founding Fathers would be Oh So Proud of what we have become.