About Me

Name: dolfinwriter
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Review of American Carol

I took my wife today to see American Carol. It was very funny, and for a retired Navy guy, there were parts that had me in tears--at times from laughing, and at other times with pride to be an American.

I would describe it as part Charles Dickens, part Charlie Daniels, part Leslie Nielsen (of the Naked Gun series), and part 24 TV Series with Keifer Southerland).

I'm not happy that they chose to make little kids say some pretty nasty words and make some gestures they probably don't understand. That really takes away from the Conservative message, and it would have been just as funny without that.

It also seemed a bit disjointed. They could have done a better job of tying the various scenes together.

There were other things that many people just may not get (those who can tell you who won the last American Idol or Survivor, but don't know who is the Vice-President or the Secretary of State). Dennis Prager calls it the age of stupidity. What's wrong is right and what's right is wrong, up is down, and inside is out...

The central character is a spoof of Michael Moore, named Michael Malone. It starts with him in front of Che Guevarra Hospital in Cuba. I think most people won't even recognize the name. My wife has her Master's, and she didn't know the name. She recognized his picture when I showed her. But like many people I have met in California, she didn't know who Wyatt Earp was either...!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Something Bigger Than All of us

I'm worried about this campaign, and therefore I am worried about my country.
 
Sarah hasn't done well in her interviews with the MSM piranhas--depending whom you ask, anyway. In any event, I'm sure Katie Couric got a nice fat bonus for making Sarah squirm in that first one. WE know it was an ambush and pure "Gotcha!" journalism, but the left is laughing hysterically, and what worries me is whether John McCain knows that.
 
Remember that McCain wasn't our first choice for a number of reasons. For one thing, he seems always to have been enamored with the MSM hacks who are now trying their level best to destroy Sarah Palin. I'm not so sure he gets that they absolutely freaking HATE her! Maybe he thought his previous sucking up to them would endear Sarah to them or something.
 
FINALLY today she went on Hugh Hewitt for about ten minutes. I hope to see more of that in the next month plus. There wasn't much we didn't already know, but there are millions who still don't know much about her and need to hear her voice and see her face on every outlet possible--not just on PBS and John McCain's favorite leftie shows like Letterman! Please don't put her on Michael Savage though. The guy is often right, but he's so over the top, and I've already heard his rant about Sarah. There's no convincing that guy. He'll just call her a communist rat and scream at her. I'm sorry, but he gives conservatives a bad name.
 
I'm reading her bio, Sarah. I just got to the point where she won the Alaska GOP primary for governor, and she and her much more experienced running mate for Lt. Governor are out of money, out of ideas, and they are getting no help from the GOP because she has basically dumped in all their Wheaties. There's something that really touched me.
 
On page 102, "What Sarah and Parnell shared from the beginning was a sense that they were part of something more profound than personal politics or campaign strategy. That realization forged the beginning of trust between them."
 
"'It wasn't about Sarah, and it wasn't about me. It was about something bigger. We knew that for this to work, it would have to be through hands greater than ours' Parnell said."
 
I felt this the night that John McCain announced her and she gave that awesome speech at the Convention. I pray that that something more profound is destined to continue to Washington. I pray for God to guide John McCain because I'm not so sure he will get there the way he's been going. There's a great piece over at Fox News, The Mishandling Of Sarah Palin.
 
On another note, our leaders are failing us at every level. Ironically, the very party who constantly lectures us about our "World Standing" seems not to be the slightest bit concerned about this "World Standing"!  

Someone in a leadership position needs to get on national TV and address the nation and explain this financial debacle and the necessary rescue in terms that "Joe six-pack" can understand. Then they need to lay out a plan to phase out the corrupt pseudo government entities that perpetuated this mess, repeal the Community Reinvestment Act, repeal Sarbanes-Oxley and replace it with something more reasonable and realistic. I'd love to see a few people go to jail too.
 
If that were done, not only would the Dems currently playing politics with our security and our livelihoods be forced to do serious work for a change and get this done, but the necessary legislation would get all the support it needs, and just maybe we would get a Democrat rout in Congress in the November election.
 
Unfortunately that is one of my main complaints about the man who SHOULD be giving that talk, George W. Bush.
 
Mr. President, I acknowledge that you tried to warn Congress to take action before it came to this, but you have failed miserably to communicate the situation to we the people. You have failed to communicate and make the case that you could have and should have on a number of issues, from oil and gas exploration and drilling to Social Security to the Iraq War. Only if Obama is elected will I even miss you on January 21st.
 
And the Dems are right about one thing. If McCain is elected, in a way it WILL be four more years of the same. More of the same incompetent communication, because McCain is no better at making the case he should than Bush is.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Like Some 5th Grade Punk Kid

Like Some 5th Grade Punk Kid

I never cease to be amazed at the audacity of liberals.

Barack Obama tells his cheering crowd “They must think you’re stupid”, as he stands before the American people, claiming to be an innocent victim of a John McCain smear. As they say in the south, I would love to tell the Illinois Senator about himself.

Tuesday September 9th, 2008, Barack Obama was talking about the McCain/Palin campaign in front of a cheering crowd and said that you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig. The crowd erupted into applause and cheering at this, and the man would have to be deaf or a moron to not know they were reacting to what he was saying about Sarah Palin. They heard the same thing that I and many other very angry Americans heard.

I don’t care what anyone says; he called Sarah Palin a pig with lipstick.

The man chooses his words much too carefully to have said this by some innocent mistake. In his whiny “Daddy, they’re questioning my patriotism!” denial, Obama claims this is just a McCain campaign smear, and that he, the messiah, is actually the victim and has done nothing wrong.

There is no way on Earth that Obama could not have known what that crowd was reacting to. He calculated it, and he said it on purpose, knowing full well that he would be called on it, but that he could plausibly deny it because there is no way to prove his motive.

He must think we’re all stupid.

And he gets double mileage out of it, because now he can stand there and pretend to be indignant and accuse McCain of slimy “Karl Rove” politics. He stands there and accuses Sarah Palin of playing the "Gender Card" as if he has never played the "Race Card"! Does he think we have forgotten that "Oh, and did I mention he's black?" comment? Very shrewd Senator, but just as transparent, and even more juvenile.

This isn’t the first time Obama has done something juvenile like this. He thinks we didn’t notice when he called Sarah’s hometown “Wasilly”, and then there was the time he slyly (he thought) gave Hillary the finger.

Obama reminds me of a character in a book I read when I was probably in 5th grade.[1] The book describes one young hoodlum in words to the effect of “The kind of guy who never played fair in his life, but always the first to yell ‘Cheater!’”

That’s Barack Obama in a nutshell (and many other liberals too…)

He reminds me of nothing so much as a 5th grade hoodlum who has done something he shouldn’t and then looks straight in your eyes and lies through his teeth that what he did was somehow an accident.[2]

I’m hearing other people compare him to a 5th grader also. I was watching the news, and I heard some women at a rally say that calling girls names is what you do in 5th grade, and they don’t want a 5th grader running the country. Amen!

Yeah, I know all the responsible people (Dennis Prager, Bill O’Reilly, etc.), said publicly that they don’t think Obama meant it that way. That’s what they have to say publicly, because sadly we can’t prove his motive. I would bet money that behind the scenes, off the record, and off camera they would agree with me.

And in the interest of full disclosure, I have every respect for a US Senator, but I have NO respect for Barack Obama. None. Zip. Zilch. Nada. Not because he’s a liberal and a Marxist, but first because he’s just another slimy, dishonest, scumbag, elitist, US military hating, Ivy League educated politician, playing very dirty politics while pretending to be something shiny and new.

My real heartache with this man who wants so much to be the Commander in Chief of the greatest force of fighting heroes in the world, is that he now claims that he loves this country, but he cannot deny that has a problem with our flag, and that he’s very comfortable hanging out with an unrepentant terrorist and other people who openly spew the venom of their HATRED of this country! (And because he’s a liberal and a Marxist who wants to gut our military, surrender to the terrorists, and raise my taxes so he can give tons of money to people who haven’t worked, and sacrificed and saved as my wife and I have!)

I would love the opportunity to vote for a black man for President, and I so wish that race were not an issue, but if we were all honest, we would have to admit that Obama would not be where he is today if he were a white man. He represents the ultimate Affirmative Action. I don’t hold that against him, but against his empty-headed, sycophantic, sobbing, slobbering, adoring and sometimes fainting fans from the DC Beltway to the celebrity mansions in Malibu.

Now, those who know me know that I will set straight a falsehood, regardless who it’s about. I believe we’re nothing if we don’t have our honor and our integrity. I could not live with myself if I cheated to win something, and I could not live with myself if I had to lie or even repeat something I did not personally verify true, to paint even someone I don’t like in a bad light.

To be fair, Sarah Palin came out swinging. No one gets where she is and does what she has without making some powerful enemies. She had to know they were going to come after her. But the kind of attacks I’ve been seeing on her family are reaching a new low of disgusting, dishonest, and just beneath the least bit of human decency. I think Caribou Barbie is kinda cute, but I’ve heard her called White Trash; I’ve heard her called Trailer Trash; I’ve heard her called W-H-O-R-E! You’d think she had a Nazi flag hanging on the outside of her snow machine garage! I don’t know that we would ever have seen this kind of attacks on a WWII vintage Nazi! Was it Diane Sawyer who asked Ahmedinijad what he listens to on his iPod? Good grief!

The truth is that John McCain has caught EVERYONE off guard with Sarah Palin, and the left wing of the DNC (is that redundant?), is in full meltdown. They are panicked, and they don’t know what to do. So they are defaulting to their natural state. They’ve become mean and nasty, and we all know that for all their talk about compassion, liberals as a general rule are meaner and nastier than anyone else on the block.

Is Obama acting Presidential? You have to be kidding me! And not even those on the right are calling him on his just immature behavior!

Someone acting truly Presidential would have recognized that the term “lipstick” has a new context, and would have avoided that word altogether. But he’s desperate and willing to gamble that he will get away with it. He knows the sycophants and the Kool-Aid drinkers will only cheer him, and the responsible people will say they don't think he meant it that way. The rest of us don't have a voice, hence the root of Sarah's appeal in the first place.

The empty suit who would be President is acting like a 5th grader, and in more ways than one. Freaking grow up already, Senator.



[1] It’s called Rascal. It’s about a 12 year-old boy in 1918 named Sterling North who inherits a baby raccoon to raise. Maybe I should add it to my reading list… It’s a great book if you have kids who would like a story about a boy and his raccoon in what seems like a simpler time!

[2] It shouldn’t come as a shock that one of those 5th grade hoodlums is doing life in prison for rape and murder in our tiny Kansas home town. His crime and trial were written about in Reader’s Digest in 1987 or 1988 because he was one of the first people ever convicted using DNA evidence. I’m sure a number of those 5th grade hoodlums are in prison or have done time by now; others have become politicians.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain caught me entirely by surprise, but that's what he does!

It really only struck me this morning--I'd cut off my arm before I'd vote for Hillary for President or for VP, and that has nothing to do with her being a woman. She's just not the right woman for the job.

I'd vote for Sarah Palin in a heartbeat, and in part because she's a woman. The now desperate Democrats are trying to say McCain waited until the last minute to decide instead of being "proactive" (?), and that he only picked her because she's a woman, and that he would not have chosen her if Obama had chosen Hillary or another woman.

I don't think that's true, and in any event, I say of course that was a factor, but so what? That's not the only reason, because I'd vote for any man or woman of any color with her credentials. People always operate on multiple levels of motive. McCain was just fortunate to find such a well qualified woman. I suspect he decided a long time ago, but has just kept it very close.

Just as Hillary is not the right woman, Obama is also just not the right man for the job.

Obama has to be kicking himself now, and I'm sure Hillary is fit to be tied. She spent basically her entire political life trying to get into the White House and then BACK into the White House, and she lost out. Then this little upstart Palin comes along and without even suggesting interest in the executive ticket, she is now the Republican candidate for VP! There's always 2012, but who knows what the world will look like by then... Today's Democrats should study what happened to the Federalists for their opposition of James Madison in the War of 1812.

I think although an Obama/Clinton ticket could win, he would have been foolish to pick Hillary. There's too much Clinton Administration baggage (read “uninvestigated, and likely-to-never-be-investigated, corruption), and Bill himself would upstage Obama anywhere they appeared together. That would defeat the purpose in a lot of people's minds, of having the first black President--especially after they used to call Bill the first black President (don't ask me to defend that--I just know they did it!)

Obama could have picked any number of women other than Hillary, but he didn't. He picked Joe Biden, and the only member of Congress with a more liberal, far left voting record than Joe Biden IS Barack Obama! Bill Clinton said Obama "hit it out of the park", but Biden didn't bring any votes. Everybody who was far left and everybody who hates Bush and all the rest of the "evil Republicans" was already voting for Obama.

To be sure, there are those racist crackers who would never vote for any black man, but bringing Biden on isn't going to change those people's bigotry, nor their votes. I suspect any of them who are Bush haters will vote for whatever 3rd party candidates or Independents are running, or just stay home with a six pack and their bug-zapper.

At the same time, McCain has hopefully sealed the deal with those who call themselves conservatives but who were planning not to vote for McCain because they were not willing to “compromise their principles”. They would gleefully vote in or allow to be voted in, Marxist leadership in the White House and in Congress, but they wouldn’t compromise their principles. Wow!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DNC Circus in Denver this week

I’ve been asked if I watched the DNC Convention. I tried to watch some of it, but life and family took priority, and when I did manage to tune in, I had to change the channel after a few minutes. All the speeches are transcripted on the Internet, and I heard all the choice sound bytes later, on the radio. I have to ask, what country are these people living in? They obviously don’t live in the United States I was born and raised in, and which I would give my life to defend.

First, be sure that anywhere that appears the word “invest”, substitute “spend your tax dollars” (I found seven instances, between Hillary, Obama and Joe Biden).

I did see parts of it and saw Ward Churchill and his thugs shove around a Fox News Reporter, and then as I’ve heard the words come from the different speakers, I was struck by a clear (to me) parallel that I may not successfully explain. One of Stephen King’s early works was a novel called The Stand, first published in 1978, and finally made into a movie in 1994 starring conservative Gary “Lieutenant Dan” Sinise as Stu Redman.

It’s a pre and post-apocryphal novel where a biological warfare flu bug gets out of the research lab and wipes out most of mankind. There are scant thousands left who are inexplicably immune to the flu. These folks divide up into two camps, based on dreams of two characters. One is an evil character, not the devil himself, but perhaps a demon, named Randall Flagg, “the devil’s imp”. The other is a 100+ year-old black woman in Nebraska, named “Mother Abigail”.

A bit of King’s background is that he is a Democrat, and a recovering alcoholic. King’s stories are often populated with evil government intelligence, scientific, and research organizations (think black helicopters), and soldiers who are basically mindless thugs who won’t hesitate to brutalize civilians. I have a suspicion that King was sexually abused as a child, but I’ve never seen any overt admission by him. We write what we know, and he writes about a boy being molested by a pedophile posing as a “poleethman”.

A number of things combined at once to inspire King to write The Stand. There was a story about a Chemical/Biological Warfare (CBW) leak that had killed a bunch of sheep. There were SLA photos in which the then still at large Patty Hearst participated, featuring an apparently faceless Donald DeFreeze, and there was something he heard on the radio and had written down:

Once in every generation the plague will fall among them.

Flagg’s people migrated to Las Vegas, and Mother Abigail’s people migrated to Boulder Colorado. Flagg claimed that their society was superior because they had no homosexuals, no drug abusers, no adulterers… His band of goons wearing law officer badges crucified them all.

Well, that’s all very informative, but what’s the point? Just that Ward Churchill, surrounded by his black-shirted goons reminded me very much of Randall Flagg and his goons. Or for that matter, Hitler and his brown shirted goons. There were the repeating words of Dennis Kucinich, “Wake up America”! Surely Dennis Kucinich knows that “Wake up Germany” was a Nazi brown shirt slogan in 1936!

I am awestruck by the single breath contradictions, as I heard story after story of this person or that person who pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, and how Obama’s is the great American story—and in the same breath, America is racist, xenophobic, sexist, ageist, specist, controlled by the oil companies and the pharmaceutical companies, we have the worst economy since the great Depression, and no one can get ahead… and of course, it’s all George Bush’s fault! [YAWN!] It has nothing to do with the Democrats in Congress refusing to allow drilling for more oil, or with Bill Clinton having vetoed it when Congress did pass it. It has nothing to do with forcing mortgage lenders to practice “Affirmative Lending” by pointing out that there were more loans made to white people than to black people, and claiming that this directly correlated to racial discrimination by lenders.

When Hillary was talking about the Underground Railroad and said “When you see the torches in the forest, keep going!” can ANYONE tell me what the hell she was talking about, and what relevance it has to today? And they say the Republicans are stuck in the past?!?!?!?

I can never listen to Michelle Obama; she just makes my ears bleed. I cannot STAND her whining about how hard it is to be a mother and a housewife on $4.2 Million a year, or even on her Hospital Administrator salary of $260K a year. $260K isn’t a huge amount somewhere like SoCal, but in Illinois? But what did me in on her was the “For the first time in my adult life I’m proud of my country”, meaning there was never anything about this country to be proud of before Barack ran for President. And then Barack has the gall to say that we cannot criticize her after she bad-mouths this country.

Bill Clinton I expected to talk about the failed policies of the last eight years, blah, blah, blah party line, blah, blah, blah... He didn’t disappoint.

There was Dennis “The menace” Kucinich. What country do you live in Congressman? Up with this, up with that… I pride myself on keeping this “Family friendly”, but basically Congressman, up yours! Good God, get a clue about the country you live in and which you claim to represent!

Joe Biden I expected to take the party line as well, but to take it even further to the left than Bill/Hillary. He also did not disappoint. “When I got knocked down by guys bigger than me, she sent me back out and demanded that I bloody their nose so I could walk down that street the next day.” Apparently Senator Biden, you did not learn the lesson!

We will hold Russia accountable for its actions, and we’ll help the people of Georgia rebuild.” How will you do that Senator Biden? The same way the UN held Saddam accountable?

The same way Madeline Halfbright and Jimmy Carter held North Korea accountable?

The same way the UN holds Sudan, Rwanda, Somalia, and Zimbabwe accountable?

The same way the vaunted “International Community” held Slobodan Miloševic accountable? (who would still be making a mockery of his years long trial if someone had not finally taken justice into their own hands (I suspect), and helped him to reach room temperature before we all died of old age).

By asking both sides to “show restraint” again?

By going to the UN and ask the Security Council (on which Russia has a veto vote by the way!), to pass 17 resolutions, each asking Russia to leave, each time saying “Pretty please? With sugar on top? Please get of out of Georgia!” and then “Alright Vladimir, we really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, REALLY mean it this time!”

And I am here for everyone I grew up with in Scranton and Wilmington. I am here for the cops and firefighters, the teachers and assembly line workers—the folks whose lives are the very measure of whether the American dream endures.

No Senator, you’re there for their union goons, and for those of their members foolish and naïve enough to believe the unions truly care about them!

And finally, Senator Obama, the messiah himself! Many are saying that it’s a great speech. Fine. Precious few are saying “It’s a great speech, but it’s a bunch of crap!” As usual, the Senator is short on specifics, but long on emotion, rhetoric and platitudes, and with some glaring omissions—like that he plans to dramatically raise taxes on higher income families and on corporations.

So you’re going to give 95% of all working families a tax cut. How are you going to do that Senator? Many of them don’t PAY taxes! Many of them get a US Treasury check each year between January and April for thousands of dollars above and beyond anything they might have paid in. Either you don’t know that and you’re a fool, or you do know it, and you’re making them an empty promise to get their votes. What are you going to do? Give them a BIGGER check?!?!?!?

He found it wasn’t received well when he said “And did I mention he’s black?” So he has new language "I realize that I am not the likeliest candidate for this office. I don't fit the typical pedigree". This is just code for “And did I mention he’s black?” The sad truth Senator, the only people who care are you, and all the rest of the genuine racists in this country, and they are a very small sliver these days.

And when I hear a woman talk about the difficulties of starting her own business, I think about my grandmother, who worked her way up from the secretarial pool to middle-management, despite years of being passed over for promotions because she was a woman.” But again, it’s the Republicans who are always accused of being stuck in the past.

To claim that McCain would not go after bin Laden if we knew what cave he is in, but that he, the messiah, Obama would magically accomplish everything that Bush has failed to do for eight years. Some words come to mind: hype, hyperbole, dishonest, exploit, uninformed, naïve, hubris…

I’m done with this. I sincerely hope that once Stanley Kurtz completes going through the seventy feet of file cabinets full of documents about Bill Ayers, and Barack Obama and the Weather Underground domestic antiwar and terrorist organization, Obama will be finished as a national politician. These people holler and whine about civil liberties and wiretapping, even as they themselves are trying to silence legitimate questions into Obama’s past and his associations with these confessed criminals and terrorists.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jeremiah Wright

Listening to news tonight, something occurred to me about Jeremiah Wright

I highly doubt I'll get any political analyst job out of my ideas : -), but I have some thoughts really burning tonight...

I was driving around tonight looking for stuff for a little lighting and cable job I've been doing in my house the last few weeks. The radio is wall to wall Obama and "Reverend" Wright.

My first thought after hearing Obama's reaction to the talk his "pastor" gave today was that Obama has to be on the phone with him saying "Man, you gotta just shut up and go away if you want a black man to be President!"

That's when it struck me, that's the antithesis of men like Jeremiah Wright. He doesn't want Obama to get elected, and he doesn't care if he hurts Obama! The LAST thing he wants is for Obama or ANY black man to be elected President. Like Farrakhan, Sharpton, Jackson, Rangle, Julian Bond, Cornel West, (and who's the Banana Boat guy?) et al, he has his own agenda.

The really interesting thing I think is that "Reverend" Wright may not even realize it himself, and if asked, would likely deny it, but would probably be evasive and ask something like "Did you listen to the whole sermon? Well, that nullifies THAT question!" The closest analogy I can give is the way the spouse of an addict (drunk, gambler, whatever), will subconsciously manipulate and sabotage things to actually sabotage the drunk if he/she manages to get some kind of help and start down the path of sobriety (someday I should complete that 3rd BS in Abnormal Psychology...) The spouse is him or herself addicted to chaos, and will try all kinds of things to return the relationship to comfortable and familiar chaos.

"Reverend" Wright has personal, financial, emotional, and political reasons to keep the pot stirred up and to be able to thunder on about "The US of KKK-A"!

The day a black man is elected POTUS, he and all those named above are suddenly out of jobs (and their identity—that’s who they are; that is the very essence of their being, even if it is just a big empty hole right through the middle of ‘em).

So I think Obama's judgment is suffering on this front as well, and no one is talking about it. But hide and watch--we have not seen nor heard the last of "Reverend" Wright. He is now hurting Obama, but he will not be quiet, and he will not go away.

Another possibility is that Obama is thinking ahead more moves than I can in Chess, and this is all part of some scheme he and "Reverend" Wright are both party to. I don't know how this ultimately helps him--I suck at Chess, but it's my skeptical side and just a suspicion I have.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Racism and the American Dream

Barack Obama did not feel that he was “authentically black”, and so establishes himself and his family for 20 years in a racist, anti-American, hateful, angry, filth-spewing mockery of a church. He does this for the sole purpose of establishing his black “street cred”.

But apparently Obama slept through every sermon he attended:

“The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation.

Then when he’s found out (why do they always think they will never get caught?), he comes up with this baloney that this angry, bigoted preacher is just like the crazy uncle you sometimes disagree with.

Hillary, where are you and your campaign on this? Are you asleep or just still dodging snipers’ bullets?!?!?!?

And what is this hollering “First Amendment!” whenever they are called out for saying really dumb things, or endorsing or supporting or at least condoning those who do? First they always say it’s just “snippets” taken out of context, and then they start hollering about the First Amendment! The point isn’t that Jeremiah Wright or even Obama have done something illegal.

For God’s sake, we have given literally millions of American lives over the last 230+ years for Obama and for Reverend Wright to have complete freedom to say and to write any stupid, inflammatory, racist, anti-American thing they wish and not be hauled away in the night to some prison, dungeon or “re-education camp”. This has NOTHING to do with the First Amendment, and no one is saying ANYONE has done anything illegal or that anyone should go to jail!

This is about judgment and therefore fitness to be President of this nation and the Commander in Chief of the most awesome and lethal military in this very dangerous world!

On another level, I can see justification to investigate the legitimacy of Trinity United Church’s tax exempt status. But that is the job of the IRS, not some publicity seeking Congressmen!

In the same article I reference above, Charles Coulter of the Kansas City Star Editorial Board first says:

Rev. Wright is not the first black minister to condemn this country for its racist practices.

Then switches to this:

Sen. Obama has done nothing to indicate he is anti-American. In fact, his whole life is a testament to the American Dream.

Now just to emphasize a bit, perhaps Mr. Coulter didn’t even realize the magnitude of what he said, but these are his words, Barack Obama’s whole life is a testament to the American Dream.

I would love to ask Mr. Coulter, so what’s the problem? Please detail what current American racist practices you’re talking about! Please include how Barack Obama managed to dodge those obstacles, and become a testament to the American Dream!

Let me emphasize again, CURRENT American racist practices! Don’t tell me about slavery. Don’t tell me about Jim Crow. Don’t tell me about Tuskegee or the 92nd/93rd Infantry Divisions. And don’t tell me about long dead anti-Civil Rights politicians.

Creating HIV to kill black people? As precision weapons go, this one must be worse than the WWII carpet bombing of German cities where 160,000 allied airmen died between 1939 and 1945, and killed between 300,000 and 600,000 Germans.* AIDS infections among whites rank second only to blacks, and among gay men, nearly twice as many whites are infected as blacks! Or is that just “collateral damage”?

[*Note: I’m using only figures for German civilians killed. These figures don’t begin to show the importance of the destruction of targets that were significant to the Nazi war machine. In that light, creating the AIDS virus is wildly inaccurate and ineffective if it was intended only to kill blacks!]

Besides, and I haven’t told many people this, but someone close to me died of AIDS, and I take personal exception to this claim.

But really Reverend, instead of blaming America, how about preaching the virtues of abstinence and monogamy, (or at the very least, condoms!)? How about preaching don’t stick needles in your body that have been in someone else’s body? Those two rules could eradicate AIDS!

Coulter goes back to this:

Let's get back to the issue of how to make this country a success for all of its people -- black and white, rich and poor, woman and man.

So America is racist, even though Obama’s life is a testament to the American dream. Is that the racist American dream? Or just regular colorblind America?

I think I need a lifeline. How did a black man become such a “testament to the American dream”? And if Obama can do it, why not others? Was it Obama’s white half or his black half that is responsible for his phenomenal success in the US of KKK-A?

Why is it that Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, and Justice Clarence Thomas are not testaments to the American dream? Oh! Because they’re not “authentically black”! They’re “sellouts”! They get Oreos thrown at them by “real” black people!

Why is Obama a testament to the American dream, but these three are just sellouts?

In Obama’s apologist speech, he said,

And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way.

Why is it that what’s good for the goose in this country is not always good for the gander?

I remember other “snippets” for which a Republican senator and two talk show hosts (Don Imus and Michael Savage) each paid dearly. Now I’m not crazy about Trent Lott or really any career politician, nor especially Imus. I think for both, their time has come and long gone, as well as many others.

In each case, “snippets” were ultimately used to justify firing someone (and in Lott’s case, to justify calls for censure, finally leading to him stepping down as Senate Majority Leader). Trent Lott and Imus prostrated themselves repeatedly for one, single, solitary “snippet”, and Trent Lott pathetically so. Not good enough.

And here’s one of the things that irks me about the world we live in today—I know if I don’t qualify my own position, someone will say I’m a racist or a bigot for defending idiotic statements from whatever corner has an iron in the fire. It really would not be the first time I’ve been called a bigot for taking a stand against leftist propaganda or politically correct lunacy. I don’t care for Trent Lott, but I think what he said was used inappropriately by people with an agenda to make political hay.

Imus—I can’t stand him, and what he said was asinine. I don’t want to debate whether it was appropriate to fire him, but it was a bit amusing to watch the left destroy and devour one of their own. Someone said he has a history of saying such things, but the comment about the Rutgers girls was the only one I have ever heard.
 
Savage—I agree with Bernard Goldberg in placing Savage among the 100 People Who Are Screwing up America. I think Savage is brilliant, well-educated, well-informed, and most of the time he’s right and willing to say things that many will not. But his venomous outbursts—even at complete morons—are what turned me to another station. One Democrat NPR fan friend of mine heard him one day and said she would never listen to him again (she’s a helluva nice lady; she’s just a bit misguided!) That’s the danger of Savage—people who really should hear what he has to say, hear him and say “If that’s what a conservative is, I want no part of it!”

Now we have sound cuts from Obama’s 1994 book coming out, voiced by Obama himself, profanity, racial baggage, and all. Wow.

First of all, this man claims to want to be a “race uniter”, yet I hear an identity confused man still carrying a lot of racial baggage. People who don’t have racial baggage just don’t see in color like he does, and apparently always has!

Please don’t anyone tell me I don’t know what it is to be black. I know that. I also don’t know what it is to be Asian, Native American, or even a “rich white folk”!

I submit that not ONE of these angry, filth-spewing, black men throwing down the race card at every perceived injustice has the first clue what it is to be a white man of ANY social standing.

Do they really think that “rich white folks”, let alone poor white folks never experience trials, tribulations, injustices, struggles, sacrifice, hard work, discrimination…?!?!?!?

Do they really think that as a young white boy who grew up basically “poor white trash”, that I didn’t experience discrimination myself by a small town employer who hired only people like the Fire Chief’s daughter, or the State Wrestling Champion (who was black, by the way)?

Or a better question—how do I KNOW that employer hired only those people? The people who worked there seemed to be all the “pretty people” and the people who had all the right labels on their clothes, and all the people whose parents were “somebody” in town. Did that employer discriminate against me because I was a poor nobody, or was it just my perception that he did?

HOW DO BLACKS KNOW WHAT THEY HAVE FACED AND DEALT WITH IS ALWAYS RACISM, AND NOT JUST THE WAY LIFE IS SOMETIMES?!?!?

Obama’s buddy felt that women always turned him down for dates because they must be racist. Maybe they just didn’t want to date black guys! Maybe they really DIDN’T want to date a fat "greasy-mouthed" guy of ANY color! That makes them racist? But beyond that, does he think the average white guy—let alone poor white trash—has it any easier?

Does anyone who believes this really think that white guys never get turned down by these same women?

Obama’s commentary states that he himself did not have much success with women at that time because he was shy.

When did the black community get exclusive rights to shyness or difficulties with women?

If only I’d been born black so that I could blame every problem in my life on institutional racism!

I recognize that Obama claims to have attempted to moderate his friend’s claims of coed racism. But I just recently realized the thing that would convince me of his sincerity is a recognition that “Ya know what? White folks have it hard sometimes too!”

That’s what I mean that these people haven’t the first clue what it is to be white, or any other color for that matter.
 
So if the path to success in modern day America has been difficult for some solely because of race, gender, etc., then I had everything given to me on a silver platter because I’m a white male?!?!?

In my example, I have tried my best to put myself in that small town employer’s shoes and ask “Would I have hired me?” I won’t go into detail, but I have to honestly say that I would not have hired me at that time. Yet I’m certain that if I’d had a different family name, he would have hired me.

Reparations? I grew up poor, worked my butt off in the Navy, sacrificed a lot of nights and weekends in class and doing homework or research, and writing papers, and managed to complete my BS and about 90% of a Master’s while I was on active duty. My wife (who also grew up poor), and I actually graduated together and both got our Master’s the same day. That wasn’t easy to do. We juggled and staggered class schedules to make sure one of us was home with our boy. We scrimped, saved, and paid a lot of her tuition, but still ended up with some student loans. But I would be expected to pay reparations to black folks for what some of my ancestors did to some of their ancestors 150 years ago, notwithstanding those of my ancestors who fought and died in the Civil War to free the slaves?

This victim culture we have created and allowed people like Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, Bella Abzug, Betty Friedan, and Robin Morgan to perpetuate minimizes the struggles, difficulties, and hardships that people have faced who are NOT a member of the same victim group as those making a claim of bigotry, not to mention their hard work and sacrifices that they have made to achieve whatever they consider success.

And I’m truly sick of it.

I look forward to the day that we all recognize that not every struggle or injustice we face in life has to do with race, skin color, social standing, gender, sexual orientation, etc.

Most of all I look forward to the day that men like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are exposed for what they really are. At first it occurred to me that what they do amounts to enabling.

They enable the black community to continue to live in ignorance of how they are being manipulated and used by the DNC for political purposes.

They enable the black community to continue to live in poverty and squalor.

But what Sharpton and Jackson and others like them do goes beyond simply enabling. They are pushers. They are dealers in the drug of race victimization, and so is Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. They profit off of it, and they are given credibility by the black community and by the MSM because they are themselves black.

That makes their crime (a crime against humanity, in my book) even more abhorrent to me, that they profit from deceiving and manipulating their own, while proclaiming themselves the righteous representatives of their race.

That would probably not be so bad if what they do ever actually helped anyone. But it doesn’t.

Instead it ensures that the masses of the black community will not look at itself in a mirror, thereby trapping them in poverty, poor inner city schools, single parent households with no fathers in the picture, drugs and gangs and hip-hop culture, and then blame it all on the institutional racism of “rich white folks”. This is identical to the thought process of an addict, in that their life troubles brought on and exacerbated by their own behavior in reality, become in their own mind, anyone’s fault but their own.

Sharpton and Jackson extort money and apologies from whomever is foolish enough and willing to pander to this nonsense and let themselves be victimized by it. And whomever is willing to place their own interests above those of the black community as a whole. I place Trent Lott and Don Imus both firmly in that camp. These two and others like them are the enablers. Desperate to save their own careers, they prostrated themselves before the likes of Sharpton and Jackson, begging, PLEADING for their forgiveness!

So some of us “white folks” are guilty as well, if not of overt racism, then of a subtle racism in placing their own careers a peg above doing the right thing for the black community. I don’t think we have a prayer of improving things for blacks (by first making it possible for them to see that they have to change within themselves), until men like Trent Lott and Don Imus are able to tell Sharpton and Jackson where to insert the apologies and monetary reparations they seek to extract.

That said, Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. goes yet a step further to the sinister. It’s one thing to peddle the notion that white racism is institutional and widespread, if not universal, but this Jeremiah Wright Jr. actually hates this country. God Damn America? US of KKK-A? Deliberately creating and infecting people of ANY race with the AIDS virus to wipe them out? He’s either deluded, or insane, or both.
 
It's fascinating to see the masses of sycophants and apologists march out and claim that Reverend Wright says these things because he really loves this country and just wants it to be better. I expect this from the brainwashed and ignorant American Idol and hip hop masses.
 
But to think that the man who wishes to be the next most powerful man in the world seeks the counsel and guidance from someone who so obviously hates this country?

Wow.

Obama at least has one thing right;
And for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible. … It is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts — that out of many, we are truly one”.

Too bad his spiritual mentor doesn’t think so.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We CANNOT turn the White House over to the Democrats again!

The Republican Presidential candidate nomination for 2008 is basically over but for the cryin’. I never thought I would support a McCain candidacy, but the people have spoken, and apparently the masses would rather have a McCain than a Mormon. I think they're wrong, but there's nothing we can do about that now.
 
He would not have been even my second or third choice.
 
War hero—absolutely.
 
Great American—absolutely.
 
He gets it right on the need to cut spending.
 
And he gets it right on the war, and on defense in general.
 
But he has been a lousy senator. He’ll go on Larry King, but not Laura Ingraham or Hugh Hewitt. I think it remains to be seen if McCain is sincere when he says he gets the message loud and clear that the people want the borders closed, immigration laws enforced, and the fence completed as expeditiously as possible. I thought that on just about every thing that conservatives care about, he is to the left of where I want our next President to be.
 
Now he has the nomination virtually in the bag, and I see that I will have to choose between him and a Democrat. It’s a no-brainer that there is a great yawning chasm of difference between McCain and either of the two remaining Democrats, and especially between him and Obama who now seems to have the Democratic nomination all but sewed up.
 
I also never thought I would say this, but I think I would prefer Hillary to Obama for two reasons. First, I think McCain could more easily beat Hillary. But in the end, I think she would be less harmful to the country than Obama, who is naïve, still wet behind the ears, and has been named the most liberal Senator.
 
I can only scratch my head and wonder what people are thinking who voted for McCain, but then most Americans have not had the privilege to be Navy shipmates with a Mormon. Mormons are kind and decent people. They don’t sacrifice small children or even animals. They’re patriotic, and they love this country. They fear a God that we both believe will one day judge us all.

Having been brought up Baptist, I find some Mormon beliefs to be alien to me, but we’re not voting for national pastor. We’re voting for the person best qualified to be President and Commander-in-Chief, and while I could not bring myself to vote for a Muslim in today’s world, there is not supposed to be any religious test for that office. Most importantly, the God that Mormons believe in doesn't tell them to slaughter civilians--especially women and children--in his name!

I think it's pathetic that we’re down to voting for the candidate who will be less harmful,but that's where I find myself.
 
And I can’t believe my ears when I hear that there are people who say they will stay home or vote for the Democrat this time out of protest. Are you out of your minds? If you can't have everything you want, then you will betray EVERYTHING you say you value and help turn the country over to the naïveté of that far left Obama?
 
What sense does that make?
 
I’m going to offend some people with this, but I think that’s part of what’s wrong with this country today—we’re too scared that we’re going to offend someone, or that we’re going to bloody the bully’s nose too badly.
 
In my view, these people are acting like Liberals—acting out of emotion rather than out of reason. It’s pretty childish, actually.
 
If I can’t have my way, then I’ll just take my marbles and go home!
 
They say if we're attacked, the Dems will be destroyed for years to come. First of all, it could be me, my family, or someone I love who is killed or injured in that next attack, or maybe the guy who would have discovered the cure for cancer. I’d just as soon put the guy in office who I know will do all in his power to prevent that attack and ensure our common defense and safety.
 
It won’t do any good to wait for it to happen and then point fingers at those we know NOW will only make that attack more likely. That won’t bring my son back nor bring me back to my son, and it won’t work that way in any event!
 
In fact, we are just as culpable if we put Obama in office and then point fingers when we’re attacked as we KNOW will be more likely if he is President. That’s not Conservative.
 
These folks say "I won't compromise my principles".
 
Principles like that are going to destroy this country.
 
In fact, compromising their principles is EXACTLY what they’re doing.
 
They are also forgetting the power of this liberally biased news media on the ignorant, the brain-washed, and the gullible. Remember how they blamed Bush for the 2001 recession that actually started in 2000? Remember how the 9/11 Commission grilled Condi over why didn't Bush respond to the attack on the USS COLE? That attack occurred October 12, 2000. A special team of investigators had proof by October 19 that al Qaeda was responsible (sorry, no source—I saw it in a documentary, but there is a ton of information here.
 
Leave aside the fact that it was the Clinton “Peace Dividend” that caused refueling ships to be decommissioned, and making it necessary for COLE to pull in to refuel in a Persian Gulf port known to be infested with al Qaeda, Egyptian Islamic Jihad et al.
 
Seven years later we have still not seen Bill Clinton answer why HE didn’t respond, despite this statement, "If, as it now appears, this was an act of terrorism, it was a despicable and cowardly act. We will find out who was responsible and hold them accountable".
 
The bottom line? We were afraid of offending someone by bombing al Qaeda in Afghanistan while Madame Halfbright futilely tried once again to unite the Israelis and the Palestinians in peace, harmony and choruses of Kumbaya.
 
You’re sadly mistaken if you think we will have seen the end of Bush Derangement Syndrome after January 20, 2009! If we’re attacked again with Obama in the White House, they’ll just blame Bush. They will blame everything bad on GWB for years to come, and they'll get away with it, because the ignorant, brain-washed American Idol worshipping masses will BELIEVE it! They'll say Bush told us the Iraq War would make us safer, and see! See! We told you so! They still got to us! Bush lied to start an illegal and immoral war, and it was all for nothing because it just pissed them off!
 
The most important issue of our day is the war, and our posture against radical Islam. And we can’t forget North Korea, China, Russia, Venezuela, and Cuba. The world is a dangerous place, and McCain gets it.
 
The next most significant issue is the courts and judicial appointees. As Hugh Hewitt put it, with McCain, the worst we get is Anthony Kennedy who gets it right 75% of the time. But with Hillary or Obama, the worst we get is Ruth Bader Ginsberg, former counsel for the American Communists and Liars Union (ACLU). SHE gets it wrong 100% of the time!
 
They say there is no guarantee McCain's nominees will be conservative. I say if you want a guarantee, buy a toaster. There are no guarantees about ANYTHING in this world, except that none of us are getting out of here alive! Otherwise, the only thing we can really be sure of is that Obama's nominees will ALL be liberal!
 
Don’t throw the keys of the Pentagon, Intelligence Services, Congressional Budget Office and the IRS to the Democrats. I don’t know that we could ever recover from four or even eight years of a Democrat in the White House, and especially THIS most liberal of Democrats!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Social Security

I never cease to be amazed at the ignorance of some people. I was listening to Medved this morning when someone called and tried to tell Michael he was all out to lunch on Social Security.
 
Unfortunately I didn’t catch all of it due to work obligations, but what I heard was staggering. The man actually believes that there are $3 Trillion in Social Security surplus sitting in a lockbox somewhere. When Medved tried to educate the man and tell him that Congress has been spending that surplus for 20+ years and filling the “lockbox” with IOU’s, the man said something to the effect that Americans would rise up en masse and rip Bush’s throat out.
 
When Michael tried to further educate the man and tell him it has been going on since long before Bush, the man said something to the effect that Americans would rise up and rip all their jugulars out.
 
Ya know... This is something that Congress has been doing since the time of Reagan, and four Presidents have now been party to it, including Bill Clinton, but it is somehow uniquely Bush’s fault.
 
Not only am I not a Bush apologist, I think he leaves much to be desired by true conservatives, and many of us are quite disgusted by his complete refusal to secure our borders. However, I am blown away by the idea that this ongoing fraud is his fault (as well as any natural disaster that befalls us, such as Katrina)—especially when Democrats have opposed him at every turn and tried to claim that he was going to "dismantle" Social Security whenever he has tried to give attention to permanent fixes.
 
I will be adding more to this post later, but I had to say this now.
 
Please, Republicans, Democrats, and Independents alike, if you’re reading this, educate yourself about what it was that FDR actually proposed in 1935, and what it is that Bush has been trying to get done to fully implement that plan.
 
But most importantly, you MUST educate yourselves about this “Trust Fund” fraud that Congress has been perpetrating on us for more than 20 years now.
This is not a partisan thing—Democrats and Republicans alike have their hands in this mess. There is no trust fund! It’s not there! Congress has SPENT it and dropped IOU’s in its place! Furthermore, even if every dollar were there, it would not be enough to make up the shortfalls that will be coming in future years. Baby Boomers will become eligible for benefits in increasing numbers, even as the number of working age folks paying into the system decreases.

Think about this--if Congress can't pay the country's bills NOW without spending this surplus, what are they going to do when the surplus dries up and then entitlements begin to grow beyond the surplus? Congress will have to either raise taxes or cut benefits.

I'm sick to death of partisans on either side playing politics with our children's future and with our very survival in the face of radical Islam and its many facets of evil, a rising industrial giant in Communist China, and a Russian President hell bent on reviving the Cold War as he slowly works to consolidate and gain absolute power in Russia. Too many in DC have forgotten why they were sent there and who pays their salary.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rebuttal to Be All You Can Be Without The Army

[Note on 19 July, 2009: See update at bottom]

About 18 months ago, in September 2005, the small local "newspaper" the East County Californian (actually a local branch of the Democrat Public Relations arm, posing as a newspaper, just as the NY Times and the LA Times do), published an article by a "journalist" named Miriam Raftery. The article was titled Be All You Can Be Without The Army. It was full of leftist slant against the military, and against the War in Iraq. Worse, it used either deliberate lies or careless inaccuracies to underscore certain points. I was furious, and so I wrote a rebuttal, well documented and thorough.
 
Unlike the school newspaper, they actually published my letter—after I neutered it down to 700 words, of course (to rebut an 1800 word article). Had that been all, I would not have been irritated. But the publisher did not have the courage to print my letter on its own, even after I chopped it from 3500 words to 700. He gave the “journalist” an 800 word space for a rebuttal next to my rebuttal, full of yet more lies and/or inaccuracies, and capped it with a typically whiny complaint asking whether I advocate censorship for the press. No, I don’t want censorship! I just want them to tell the truth, or at the very least to correct errors or lies when readers point them out!
 
Of course, I would like to have my own voice to comment on their lies, but I would have to buy them or start my own newspaper, I guess.
 
When it appeared in print, I wrote a new rebuttal, but they refused to publish this one, citing a once every three months policy. When I asked if they intended to at least print corrections to what reasonable people should be able to agree were falsehoods in that rebuttal, the publisher added insult and said no, citing Bush Administration announcements such as “Mission Accomplished.” So in other words, his journalistic integrity is a function of his assessment of the Administration’s integrity. I find that disturbing, appalling, maddening, disgusting, hypocritical, and just plain sleazy.
 
I can’t impact them, but I can finally have my say in this forum!
 
Here is the text of an early version of my letter to the editor in response to the article:
 
I’m writing in response to Be all you can be without the army by Miriam Raftery, in the September 22nd East County Californian. I find it unfairly biased against the military and littered with half-truths and falsehoods. Ms. Raftery quotes the New York Times, “Recruiters desperate for warm bodies to be shipped to Iraq are prowling selected high schools and neighborhoods across the country with sales pitches that touch on everything but the possibility of being maimed or killed in combat.” The ignorance, bias, and short-sightedness of this statement is stunning. What sane person wants a world without our military? Remember Hitler? Hirohito? The Berlin airlift? Libya’s Qadafi? Panama’s drug lord dictator Noriega? Kuwait under Saddam?
 
Recruiters desperate for warm bodies…” Ms. Raftery writes “Some recruiters, under pressure from falling enrollment numbers and an all-volunteer army buckling under the strains of war, are resorting to high-pressure tactics, exaggerations and in some cases, outright falsehoods.” She fails to list any falsehoods or that recruiters are competing with a booming U.S. economy. The August 2005 unemployment rate was 4.9%, a four year low (U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics). This is an example of a conveniently omitted inconvenient fact that betrays her true agenda. A second inconvenient fact is that recruiting declined much more sharply during the entire Clinton Presidency, from 1993 and accelerating into the late 1990’s (Have Improved Resources Increased Military Recruiting and Retention?). Recruiters were competing then with the Internet bubble economy, and no one can dispute that on numerous occasions, Bill Clinton ran from any engagement that resulted in casualties, or that might have. In other words, difficulties in recruiting and an ongoing war are not dots you can just draw a line between.
 
…warm bodies to be shipped to Iraq” No, not everyone goes to Iraq! Does Ms. Raftery support shipping “warm bodies” to Afghanistan to hunt down al Qaeda and Taliban? Our Armed Forces stand vigil around the world ready to defend freedom. They are also among the first on scene, providing relief after natural disasters. Some of those sent to the hurricane battered Gulf Coast were the very same 4th Infantry Division soldiers who pulled a dirty and humiliated Saddam Hussein from his spider hole in Iraq almost two years ago. The 82nd Airborne (now also known as the 82nd “Waterborne”) helped evacuate some 6,000 in New Orleans (82nd Airborne Division Becomes 'Waterborne' in New Orleans). The Air Force Reserve 304th Rescue Squadron (of the elite pararescue “PJ’s”), saved more than 1,040 people (A PJ's Night in New Orleans).
 
When deployed overseas, the troops build or renovate schools and hospitals—whatever is needed. They give native children everything from chocolate bars to baseball gloves, and lifesaving or life changing medical treatment unknown in their own countries. If you dare, read the story of Saleh “Lion Heart” Khalaf, a 9 year-old Iraqi boy nearly killed by unexploded ordnance, and saved by an Air Force Reserve surgeon deployed to Tallil Air Base, near Nasiriya. It’s unfortunate that anyone would think only of Iraq or their own politics when recruiters call.
 
…prowling selected high schools and neighborhoods across the country…” This is over the top. You have to believe that the military which defends our freedom to make such statements is some dark predator. I wonder if Ms. Raftery would even describe in such terms the registered sex offenders living closest to our schools.
 
…with sales pitches that touch on everything but the possibility of being maimed or killed in combat.” This is either a lie or complete ignorance of the paperwork that a candidate must read, fill out, and sign. From DD Form 1966/5, RECORD OF MILITARY PROCESSING:
 
Block 25 ABILITY TO PERFORM MILITARY DUTIES, subsection a. “Are you now or have you ever been a conscientious objector? (That is, do you have, or have you ever had, a firm, fixed, and sincere objection to participation in war in any form or to the bearing of arms because of religious belief or training?)”

(Emphasis my own.)
 
Ms. Raftery quotes an absolute falsehood, "Did you know – this is absolute fact – that your 17-year old doesn't need your permission to enlist?" Again from DD Form 1966/5:
 
Block 40 PARENT/GUARDIAN STATEMENT(S), subsection a. “I/we certify that (Enter name of applicant) has no other legal guardian other than me/us and I/we consent to his/her enlistment in the United States (Enter Branch of Service).
 
“I/we acknowledge/understand that he/she may be required upon order to serve in combat or other hazardous situations. I/we certify that no promises of any kind have been made to me/us concerning assignment to duty, training, or promotion during his/her enlistment as an inducement to me/us to sign this consent.”

(Emphasis my own.)
 
Ms. Raftery quotes “Leave My Child Alone” in San Francisco “Recruiters 'commonly say you can get $50,000 or $70,000 for college, yet statistics show that 57 percent of kids who join the military don't get a dime for college.'’” This is a misquote. The cited pamphlet says “Since 1985 when the Montgomery GI Bill program (MGIB) began, 57% of military personnel who signed up for the program (Presumably the MGIB program), received nothing!” But their numbers are inconsistent. On one page, “Only 35% of all program participants have received any benefits at all!” On another page, “Why do 65% of recruits who pay the required $1200 into the Montgomery GI Bill never get a dime in return?” Is it 57%? 35%? 65%? Sounds like fuzzy math.
 
They complain that the VA does not just write a $36,000 or $50,000 check for college. It doesn’t work that way and that was never promised. You have to actually go to college, and apply for benefits. I have attended a number of schools around the country, and know the process well. It’s really not that hard. I have personally completed BS and MBA degrees, funded almost entirely by active duty and GI Bill education benefits, and I am still receiving benefits. I have had to make sacrifices to take advantage of it as much as possible, but I am grateful for this benefit. I take personal exception to Ms. Raftery’s uninformed comments. My own brother is one of those who paid in $1200 and will likely never use his full GI Bill benefit. Ms. Raftery would have us believe that recruiters somehow mislead him when he joined the Navy in 1993. My brother wasn’t lied to; he has just had different priorities.
 
Ms. Raftery focuses on school district policies for parent notification of opt-out rights to withhold student personal information from military recruiters. She claims that Grossmont Union High Schoolburied” notification about opt-out provisions in a handbook for parents…” In a time of almost non-existent local school funding, GUHSD went to the trouble and expense to provide an informational handbook for parents, but Ms. Raftery says this notification is “buried.”
 
I believe if Ms. Raftery were honest, she would admit that her real agenda has less to do with concern for young men and women who could find themselves in combat in a war she opposes, and much more to do with damaging recruiting public relations to hurt the Bush Administration by hobbling the war effort. Ms. Raftery’s article reveals either her vast ignorance or blatant denial of the good of the military, and a transparent political agenda.
 
Ms. Raftery quotes Valhalla High School parent Peter Polischuk who opposes the war in Iraq. "I voted for Bush in year 2000, but I feel absolutely violated for having been lied to about the pretext of the war." This quote deserves its own article, but she again betrays her agenda. No one can prove this allegation that anyone lied about Saddam’s WMD’s, yet it continues to be repeated as fact by those driven by blind hatred of this President. George Bush took the job knowing the sort of partisan attacks he would be subject to. But I take exception when those attacks are directed at the men and women of the Armed Forces.
 
Some say “I support the troops, but not this war.” I can’t question their sincerity, but this reveals an ignorance of attacks on our troops in the Muslim world over the last 30-plus years. Iraq is no longer a rogue nation providing funding, training, aid, and comfort to terrorists, but is now a young democratic nation training hundreds of thousands of Iraqi troops and police to hunt and kill terrorists. Our enemies pouring into Iraq to attack our troops and Iraqi’s seem to understand this better than many of us do! One failure I fault the Bush Administration for in the war on terror is its continued failure to communicate, and showcase the positive progress being made in Iraq, the progress in bringing onboard former “lost” allies, and to make the case to the world that this war is not just about 9/11, and that it was never only about Saddam’s WMD’s.
 
We mourn every mother’s son or daughter lost when our troops go into battle. This war is not just about 3,000 lives taken on one day on 9/11. Why do so many seem to have forgotten the six souls lost in the first, what our enemies must consider failed, WTC bombing in 1993. I don’t see in Ms. Raftery’s article, nor often elsewhere, compassion for at least 1,000 Americans killed by Islamic radicals in the years before 9/11. Are their lives somehow irrelevant? Many were lost in bombing attacks, each of which would have been considered an act of war if a nation state could be proven responsible. Those responsible are a collection of loosely bound Islamic terror groups who have been at war with America for over 20 years. Some have disparate aims and often don’t like each other. Some of us have been in denial, and some of us still are.
 
Ms. Raftery seems to want young adults to be hopeless, helpless, and naïve. We should teach our kids to take responsibility for their own lives, not that we will isolate them from choices that may be at odds with our politics. I wouldn’t send young adults to a car dealership the first time alone and unprepared. Nor would I send them to a recruiter’s office unprepared to make more important decisions than buying a car. The Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors web site says that military service is a serious commitment, and anyone considering it should research the pros and cons. They say that money for college should not be the primary motivation for joining the Armed Forces. I think that’s all good advice! I think it’s also good advice that no promise made by anyone is good for anything unless it is in writing, but read and understand what you are signing! Young adults who have been taught these things have nothing to worry about from the most unscrupulous people in any profession. Ms. Raftery seeks to block recruiter access entirely, and ensure that our kids don’t have a choice. But as I said before, her agenda has more to do with damaging PR than it does recruiter access. She stated that calls to a local recruitment office were not returned. I only wish that she had been more specific. I would love to hear the part she left out of that story.
 
I must add that there are some people who believe that there is never a just cause for war—even when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. These folks account for roughly a constant eleven percent of the population from WWI to present. I think they are misinformed and misguided, but I also think they are genuine, and I respect their right to their beliefs. Ms. Raftery and others however, represent a more “situational” type of opposition, i.e., if George Bush thinks it’s necessary, they’re against it. She has just as much a right to voice her opinion, but I have a right to say I think she is being dishonest and to point out inconsistencies in her arguments.
 
I have a two and a half year-old son, and a 14 year-old stepson. I am retired Navy, and recruiters are welcome to contact our boys when they are of age. Their mother concurs, and so does my stepson’s father. They will be well prepared to take care of themselves and to face a world that they can expect will not always be kind to them.
 
I’ve quoted my letter faithfully, but what I wish I had restated that last sentence thus, “They will be well prepared to take care of themselves and to face both a world that they can expect will not always be kind to them, and newspapers that will not always tell them the truth.

19 July Update:

I need to add to this that the publisher above has had an awakening, or a conversion since this exchange occurred in 2005. Specifically, it was the 2008 Presidential Campaign that opened their eyes. He and his wife are now conservatives and watch Fox News rather than CNN, and they have changed their voter registration to Republican. His wife proudly proclaims to all interested that I “converted” them and turned them “to the dark side”.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Captain America is Dead

It’s been a tough week at work and at home—Lots of meetings and not much time for getting work done.
 
But I did notice that Marvel Entertainment has killed Captain America, and my mind has been kicking this around ever since.
 
Some people might say “So what?” He’s just a comic book character, and in real life, he would be 80 or 90 years old by now.
 
To me, it’s symbolic of something much more important happening to our country.
 
I liked Captain America as childhood comic book heroes go, but he wasn’t my favorite. Superman was my favorite. He grew up in Smallville, Kansas, and my own Kansas hometown was very much like Smallville.
 
But on another level, Superman wasn’t human. He was an alien, and he was invulnerable. It was easy for him to be gallant—seemingly nothing could touch him, let alone hurt him. Yet, he was ultimately willing to give his life to defend this planet. In that sense, I believe he represented everything that is good and decent about America, and about the American soldier. Our soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, and Coast Guard have not once but twice defeated a German war machine bent on world conquest, saved much of the world from fascism, defeated expansionist Communism, and continue to find themselves fighting across the globe, defending not just America’s interests, but keeping the peace, running drug interdiction operations, and both delivering and protecting humanitarian relief efforts after disasters such as the 2004 Tsunami.
 
Captain America was endowed with super-human strength and an amazing shield, but he was still human. He knew he could be killed any time he fought. In that sense, he was probably more like the American soldier than Superman.
 
But what has happened, in my view, in the death of Captain America, (and in the way that he was killed!), is the death of a common patriotic spirit born of the smoke, flames, and death of the Pearl Harbor attack—the “righteous might” spoken of by FDR in his Infamy speech, and the same spirit represented in the Charlie Daniels song, In America.
 
The death of Captain America represents to me the death of a spirit that united this country in a gargantuan effort to defeat the Japanese Empire and the Nazi war machine while continuing to supply our allies fighting by our side, and then to face down the Soviet Union and the threat of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) for nearly 50 years.
 
Sadly, I’ve said before, though maybe not here, that if we had to fight WWII today, we would lose. We would not lose because our military is not up to it. No other nation in the world can match us today in our ability to quickly and massively project our military strength to the furthest corners of the globe, and if somehow there arose of a massive alliance of rogue nations against us (“Axis of Evil” + Russia + China?), we could quickly mobilize and ramp up production of the necessary equipment to fight such a war. Furthermore, just one of our Trident missile submarines could in about 30 minutes render an area the size of Central and South America uninhabitable for 150 years.
 
What is lacking today is the will to “…win through to absolute victory”.
 
The news media today has tried almost desperately to paint the American soldier with the same brush from the Vietnam conflict—that of “baby killer.” Many people I know will deny this charge. But I have one question for them—How many stories have we seen on the bravery and courage of our soldiers in facing down some of the most barbaric and evil people that the human race has ever produced, compared to how many stories we have seen on Abu Ghraib and Haditha? How many stories have we seen on the building of hospitals, schools, roads, sanitation facilities, power plants, and saving and transforming children’s lives with modern miracle surgeries that were not available in Saddam’s Iraq? We have a U.S. Congressman condemning and convicting the marines of the Haditha incident, even before they were formally charged. This man is a former marine officer, and I think that makes his words all the more disgraceful.
 
I’ve heard some say that it’s just politics, a Democrat/Republican thing. I disagree. I think it’s all about the irrational and pathological hatred of George W. Bush, tracing back to the November 2000 election where he was accused of “stealing” the election. If people were able to study that event with an impartial mind, they would learn that when the Supreme Court determined Bush the winner, it was Al Gore demanding recounts and seeking to exclude votes such as military absentee ballots, so that HE would be declared the winner. There was a great fuss made about the fact that Al Gore actually got more votes and thus won the popular vote.
 
Can you say “sore losers”?
 
These claims illustrate only one thing—a willingness to exploit widespread domestic and global ignorance of how our Electoral College System works. Presidents John Quincy Adams in 1824, Rutherford Hayes in 1876, and Benjamin Harrison in 1888 all defeated opponents who actually got more popular votes. Our Electoral College system is unique in the world, but similar to the systems in countries like India, Germany, and Israel. This explains why much of the world does not understand how George Bush became President even though Al Gore had more votes.
 
(NOTE: Today’s Democrats would do well to remember that at the time of the 1824 election, the U.S. had basically a single party system after the Federalist party dissolved in shame due to its condemnation of James Madison in the War of 1812.)
 
So maybe they’re right—it is all about Dems vs. the GOP. Whatever... The point of the thing is, it illustrates a nation divided rather than a united national fighting spirit.
 
9/11 was this generation’s Pearl Harbor, but it was not the first time that Islamic fanatics have attacked this country. Yeah, we saw Democrats and Republicans standing together on the Capital steps, but that lasted for about two days. In the long run, 9/11 has failed to unite us in “our righteous might” to “win through to absolute victory” against this new barbaric and evil enemy. I think many of the founding fathers, as well as Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Harry Truman, Ike, and JFK would be moved to tears of sadness at what BOTH major parties have become at a time when our nation and civilization itself is in peril.
 
So maybe Captain America really is dead.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Student Indoctrination

I don’t mind people being ignorant, and I don’t mind people having naïve opinions.
 
I get really irate however, when a teacher tries to indoctrinate young impressionable minds with his own politically motivated but naïve opinions.
 
I have a 15 year-old stepson who now attends a charter school and is doing quite well. But in November 2005, he was attending a public High School in our area. One day he came home and showed me a piece in the school newspaper. The piece, titled Why I don’t say the pledge, was the answer of one teacher to a survey asking what do teachers think about.
 
I was furious after I read it and immediately wrote a rebuttal to his points and sent it to both the school paper staff, and to the teacher in particular.
 
After several weeks the faculty journalism advisor called me and asked permission to print my letter in the paper. Over the next several months, we corresponded a number of times, but for whatever reason, my letter never appeared in the school paper. I suspect that my letter was deliberately suppressed by people who would otherwise jump and scream about freedom of speech. But as I said in my first post, even the most powerful people cannot suppress me here.
 
Here you can read the text of that teacher’s comments:

Why I don’t say the pledge
 
When the bell for Period 2 rings, I drift to the back of the room, turn down the music and wait for the Pledge of Allegiance to begin. I stand quietly in the back as most students rise and recite. However, I do not join them. I do not cover my heart. I do not say the words. I have not been able to since March of 2003. It is not just the war in Iraq. The war, begun on false premises as most Americans now acknowledge, is a hideous drain on our country. Over two thousand Americans are dead, over seven thousand Americans severely injured, and over 200 billion dollars are committed to this war so far.
 
Watching this unnecessary war develop was disheartening enough and watching what the war is doing to America’s standing in the world community is likewise disillusioning, but my sadness about the state of our country does not end there. My America does not establish secret prisons around the world. My America does not imprison people for years without charges and without evidence. My America does not need to snoop into my library records. My America does not attack a grieving mother who stands up and protests the war. My America does not torture. The America whose flag I have always saluted is the country of Rosa Parks, the country that said no to segregation and discrimination.

[NOTE:  Mr. Teacher seems to be unaware that it was Democrats who opposed Civil Rights legislation.]
 

It is the country that faced the very real threat of Hitler’s desire for world domination with honor and heroism. It is a country which protects the rights of the disabled and, until recently, has been a strong voice for human rights around the world. I am confident that the country will find its way again during my lifetime. Despite the excesses and corruptions of its leaders, America has always found its way back to the rule of law. I look forward to the day when I can once again join with my students to show pride in my country. Until then, I will stand quietly, and respectfully, in the back of the room.

Let’s first be honest. This man is a devoted, card-carrying Democrat, and he hates George W. Bush. He has listed nearly every Democrat talking point, but I must have missed something, because I’m not certain what the Rosa Parks comment was about—unless it had to do with the post-Katrina mantra that the Bush administration is racist. This teacher probably gets his only news from the New York Times and CNN and/or MSNBC, supplemented by liberal doses of NPR.
 
I wrote and sent my response, and after the school contacted me, I cut the letter down to 500 words for publication, which meant either not giving each point adequate treatment, or not addressing each point. I did my best, but it never appeared.
 
Below is the full text of my original letter. I have removed the name of the school, the teacher, and the paper, more to protect my stepson than anything else.
 
[High School] Newspaper staff,
 
I am writing as a concerned parent after reading the piece in the November 23 [High School] Newspaper called Why I don’t say the pledge.
 
I’m a father and a taxpayer, and my wife is a teacher. My own education in addition to my Navy technical specialty includes a BS in Education, and an MBA with a specialization in Finance. I’m also pursuing a second BS in Computer Science. I’m firmly Conservative, but I’m no polemicist. I have defended teachers in other forums, and I oppose school vouchers as the “cure” for our broken (and broke), school systems.
 
First things first—I’m not questioning Mr. Teacher’s right to speak out or to not say The Pledge. He makes a tenuous assumption that most Americans believe the Iraq war was begun on false premises, but I am not writing to debate the legitimacy of the Iraq war. My concerns have more to do with my view of the duties and responsibilities of educators, and the bigger issue of what our flag and The Pledge stand for today. My high-schooler sees through it, but Mr. Teacher did not consider [High School] Newspaper readers who won’t recognize that the motivation behind his statement may be loyalty to one party who seeks to malign the other party.
 
I think if he supported the war, Mr. Teacher would have felt compelled NOT to speak, but that is another issue. He’s an educator and holds a position of influence. A teacher’s job is to make difficult concepts understandable, and to open young minds to learning—not to impress personal political views on them. I know [High School] Newspaper asked what he thinks about, and he gave an honest answer. I think if a job interviewer asked the same question, he would have given a different answer. In the work world, it’s usually bad judgment to wear your politics on your shirt sleeve.
 
I hope Mr. Teacher doesn’t teach History or Government. Today’s Democrats would do well to remember that the Federalists opposed James Madison and condemned him for starting a difficult and very costly war we now know as the War of 1812. They later paid dearly (politically), for their anti-war stand.
 
Thomas Jefferson hated how our merchant ships were being hijacked, their cargo stolen, and their crew enslaved. The ambassador to Paris from Islamic Tripoli (modern day Libya), told Jefferson in 1786 that the Koran allowed them to hijack merchant ships and to do whatever they pleased. When Jefferson became President in 1801, he sent our young Navy and brand new Marine Corps to put a stop to it. To this day the Marine Corps anthem honors their actions in the War on the Barbary Pirates:
 
From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli…
 
I wonder what Jefferson would say today about complaints of our handling of terrorists captured both at home and on the battlefield, who also invoke the Koran to justify barbaric behavior. Even in Jefferson’s day, not everyone agreed, but they didn’t turn their back on their country when the President made decisions they didn’t agree with.
 
Mr. Teacher said America does not imprison people for years without charges or evidence. That’s simply not true. We held Nazi war criminals until the end of that war. After the war, we held Nazi loyalists who continued to attack allied troops (upheld in U.S. Supreme Court Ex parte Quirin and Johnson v. Eisentrager).
But I’m sure Mr. Teacher is talking about Jose Padilla, a.k.a. Abdullah al-Muhajir, an American citizen, former gang member, and convicted murderer who converted to Islam after his last jail sentence. He is accused of attending al Qaeda terrorist training and conspiring to carry out acts of terror in the U.S. (Remarks of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales regarding the indictment of Padilla).
 
Mr. Teacher may not have seen all relevant facts, but his concerns are valid. If abused, the kind of power used to hold Padilla could lead to holding anyone without charge or trial, just for protesting or checking out the “wrong” library books. Indeed, J. Edgar Hoover teaches us that government always bears watching, but Padilla had his day in court. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia found first that Congressional authority granted to the President to use military force to fight terrorism after 9/11 (in place of a formal declaration of war), is enough to hold Padilla (and others like him), without charges. Second, there are sufficient checks in place to prevent abuse of this power. I won’t copy the entire text—those interested can read it here:  under Authorization for Use of Military Force Against September 11 Terrorists),
 
It starts with:
Whereas, on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous violence were committed against the United States and its citizens; and
Whereas, such acts render it both necessary and appropriate that the United States exercise its rights to self-defense and to protect United States citizens both at home and abroad; and…
 
Here’s the important part the court referred to (emphasis mine):
(a) In General.—That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
 
In other words, it applies only to someone specifically identified by the President as an “illegal enemy combatant” (i.e. terrorist). This power would last only as long as this Congressional authorization was not revoked, or remained in effect. Anyone so accused who claims not to be an “enemy combatant” is entitled to a hearing to dispute the basis of their confinement. I think Mr. Teacher has missed an incredible educational opportunity in the Padilla case to illustrate the greatness of America’s system of checks and balances of power. How many other countries in the world could say the same? Unfortunately, I doubt he understands the particulars well himself, otherwise he might view the issue differently.
 
We’re fighting an enemy our forefathers never imagined—he uses technology and our freedom to evade justice and attack that freedom. Lawmakers have a challenge to figure out how the forefathers would deal with terrorists in the U.S. and on the battlefield, and with traitorous U.S. citizens who join the terrorists. They also seek to dig out information that will save American lives at home, in the streets of Iraq, and on the battlefields of Afghanistan. Our laws didn’t anticipate cell phones, email, Instant Messaging, and the proliferation of unsecured Wireless Internet connections. The government must walk a fine line to protect us, and law enforcement needs legal tools to catch the bad guys like Padilla among us while respecting our rights. Congress has passed a law called the Patriot Act. That’s America doing its primary job of protecting you and me.

Shame on those who play politics with it.
 
Mr. Teacher spoke of America’s standing since March 2003. I frankly don’t care about our “standing” among nations like France who can’t even get off their high-horse and speak English to American tourists who’ve come to spend money in their economy, and who opposed removing Saddam from power because they’ve been stealing $Billions from the Iraqi people through a corrupt UN Oil for Food program. They have no right to judge us! That “standing” is a false notion put forward by foreign organizations and “leaders” who have NEVER liked us. It is also used by one political party to slam the other. There is another false notion that hatred of America is new and somehow uniquely due to policy decisions launched in March 2003. Hezbollah terrorists drove a truck bomb into a U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983, killing 241 Marines 20 years before March 2003.
 
Mr. Teacher said America does not attack a grieving mother who stands up and protests the war. He’s talking about Cindy Sheehan, whose son Casey fought bravely and was killed in Iraq. But Mr. Teacher may not have seen all the relevant facts about her character and credibility. My concern is with a news media such as the LA Times that not only lends her credibility, but omits certain “inconvenient” facts, and has made her their darling celebrity. She exploits her son’s name, and the media in turn exploits HER to further its anti-war agenda. The New York Times claims that Sheehan’s loss and grief entitle her to special standing and “absolute moral authority” in opposing the war. What about the “moral authority” of Diane Ibbotson and hundreds of other grieving mothers who have also lost sons in Iraq, but continue to support the war?
 
There is more to Cindy Sheehan than her opposition to the war on terror. The New York Times doesn’t tell us that Sheehan demands immediate U.S. troop withdrawal not only from Iraq, but from Afghanistan, and from “occupied New Orleans” (after Hurricane Katrina). I grant her sympathy and respect for her loss, but her profanity in her attacks on the President as a "lying b*st*rd”; "filth-spewer and warmonger"; and "biggest terrorist in the world," warrant no respect. This is a free country and politicians take the job knowing they will be subject to vicious attacks. But this is a woman unhinged, who complained in the days before Hurricane Rita that the news media was not paying enough attention to her. She has also decided she is no longer obligated to pay income taxes (the only exemption from taxes is for those soldiers stationed in a war zone).
 
The organizers Sheehan associates with at “anti-war” rallies are the WWP (World Workers Party), descended from Cold War Stalinists (hard line communists). Supposedly against war, these people supported Soviet invasions of Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Afghanistan. They also supported the 1989 massacre in Tiananmen Square, and some of the worst mass murderers of our time, including Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, and North Korea’s Kim Jong Il. Pointing out relevant facts that the news media ignores is not “attacking” a grieving mother. People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw rocks, and Mr. Teacher should be more careful whom he puts on a pedestal.
 
Mr. Teacher said America does not torture. Normally this is true—but we’re not fighting a “normal” enemy. Mr. Teacher has a luxury that our soldiers do not; he doesn’t have to see what terrorists do to people, even kids, in the name of Allah. I personally do not know whether our people have tortured terrorists—and if I did, I couldn’t talk about it. But I know this—we’re not talking about stringing everyone up by their thumbs until somebody talks. If I knew that one of these thugs had information that would save the life of just one [High School] student, I would do whatever it took to save an American life.
 
Mr. Teacher said that until recently, America has been a strong voice for human rights around the world. America is still the only remaining force for good in the world, but al Qaeda knows how to work our system and the news media. Their manual for terrorists, instruction #18 says when detained, al Qaeda members should always complain of mistreatment. You can’t judge a nation, or a President, by the actions of a few knuckleheads at Abu Ghraib (who are now in prison themselves, by the way). Regarding the hotly contested Supreme Court case over treatment and due process for “detainees” in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, legal bickering continues. But again, Mr. Teacher misses a bigger point. Even these animals who want to murder anyone who doesn’t agree with their fanatical and deranged religious views have rights to due process under our laws. That should be testament to the greatness of America.
 
Mr. Teacher said America is the country that faced Hitler with honor and heroism. If today’s CNN, CBS, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, ABC, NBC, TIME Magazine, New York Times, and Los Angeles Times had covered WWII, it would have been different. The battle for Tarawa in the Pacific, Operation Market Garden in the European theatre, and the civilian casualties of the Normandy beach invasion would have had American mothers of sons killed in the war condemning and protesting inadequate war planning, and demanding that the President bring our boys home.
 
This should sound very familiar to us all over the last five years:
“We shouldn’t be fighting Hitler! The ones who attacked us are in the Pacific! We shouldn’t divert our resources from fighting the real enemy! We can’t do both! Attacking Europe is just a way to divert attention from our failure to defeat those who really attacked us!”
 
Finally, I think Mr. Teacher has completely missed the most important point that we are the luckiest people on Earth to live in America and to have the freedom to criticize our government without being thrown in prison or disappearing in the night as in Saddam’s Iraq, or in North Korea. America is still the land of opportunity, as shown by the people from all around the globe continuing to beat a path to our door. Some come to wait hiding under our noses for a signal to carry out mass murder, but many more come simply seeking a better life in the land of the free and the home of the brave. That’s what the Statue of Liberty, and our flag, and The Pledge continue to stand for today—whether we agree or not with the policy decisions launched in March 2003 to bring freedom to 28 million Iraqi’s.
 
It is this which saddens me most about Mr. Teacher’s comments—there are Americans who seem unable to appreciate our freedom and the symbols of that freedom, even as they exercise that freedom to criticize policies they disagree with.
 
So Mr. Teacher, in my America, teachers don’t try to indoctrinate students in their own political mindset.
 
I have decided to send this letter to both the Principal of the school and the school board, along with our other reasons for pulling my stepson out of that school.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Hate Politics

 I hate politics. I really do.

There are people who know me, who when reading this would say, "Ah, that's bull! You're a political animal!"

No one who might say that knew me before 9/11, or knew me well. I was politically pretty naïve before then. The truth is I love my country more than I hate politics.

It’s not the idea of participation in Government I find distasteful; it’s the lying, the deceit, the manipulation, the misrepresentation, the special deals, and the corruption that I despise. Make no mistake—there is corruption on both sides. For every Randy “Duke” Cunningham, I'll show you a William "Cold Cash" Jefferson, who by the way is neither a war hero, nor a “Legend of Air Power”. Not only that, Jefferson has so far eluded prosecution. For every Mark Foley, I'll show you a Gerry Studds, who has never been held to account for his crime of sexual relations with a minor. And for every Dick Cheney hunting accident, I’ll show you a Ted Kennedy drunk driving accident in which a young lady lost her life after he delayed reporting the accident for over nine hours, and he has never had to answer charges for that incident.

I’m not justifying bad behavior by pointing at more bad behavior. I’m saying it is hypocritical for anyone from either side to say the other is more corrupt. In particular, Howard Dean is a L-I-A-R when he says “Republican culture of corruption.” Most people simply don’t hear about Democrat crimes and foibles, because we have a news media that is in bed with our enemies and friendly to Democrats. Dan Rather interviewing the late Saddam Hussein and then foisting forged documents on an unsuspecting public to influence a Presidential election? Diane Sawyer talking to Mahmoud Ahmedinijad about what he listens to on his iPod?

When I learned that there are people at work trying to destroy my country through its internal politics, I realized I had to get smarter about what was going on. There are many Americans all too willing to help them, and many millions of others who seem to be oblivious, both to what these people are doing, and to the very real and very deadly threat of Islamo-fascism.

Charlie Daniels had a hit song in 1980 called In America (in response to the Iran hostage crisis). Part of it went like this:

And we may have done a little bit
Of fightin' amongst ourselves
But you outside people best leave us alone
'Cause we'll all stick together
And you can take that to the bank

That’s the America that I love. I don't know where that America has gone, and I'm worried about her.

I had no political loyalty when I predicted in December 2000 that Democrats would blame President Bush for what I knew then was an already deepening recession. I was looking only at the economy and the stock market that was by then already down significantly. It was education that showed me who was lying or just gullible when a relative whom I sent that email to did not recall it six months later when he complained that George Bush had destroyed the economy. Short memories and selective memories…

But when I say such things, some people say things like “Spoken like a true Republican!” Other times I’m just called a “right wing wacko.” Those aren’t my labels—they belong to someone else. I’m actually registered Independent, because the Republicans all too often have their heads in a dark place as well. In my view, that’s a DC condition, not a Republican or Democrat condition.

I really don’t care for the labels:  right, left, liberal, conservative, Democrat, Republican… I hate politics! I really just care about doing the right thing. I grew up poor, and by rights, I should be a Democrat, condemning big business, big oil, “tax cuts for the rich,” and looking to Uncle Sam for a handout. In that world, staying in poverty is somehow more honorable than getting an education and working hard to make a good, honest living, (...staying in poverty, even while blaming “the rich” for keeping them down—It’s like a kind of insanity).

Instead I decided that I wanted a better life, and that I wanted more for my kids than I had. The way to prosperity is education, sacrifice, and hard work. There are many roads to education, and there are no obstacles save for those we put in our own way.

Let’s be clear—just because I believe George Bush was a better choice than John Kerry, doesn’t mean I like everything about him. He leaves a great deal to be desired by true Conservatives. By contrast, I’ve never met a Democrat who would criticize a single thing about Bill Clinton, Al Gore, or John Kerry (well, maybe one Democrat—and he was a U.S. Marine). Many Democrats say the same in reverse, but I challenge any of them to tell me one criticism of Bill Clinton’s Presidency, OTHER than the Lewinsky scandal—That’s just too easy of a target.

I remember hearing on the news in April 2000 that stocks were down because people were selling stocks to pay their taxes (and no one asked, “Maybe their taxes are too high?”) It made no sense to me then, but it came back to me later when I began to learn that the major news media had an agenda. Now I believe their purpose for that story was to deny/try to explain the fact that the boom was over, and that it had ended on Bill Clinton’s watch, contrary to many later claims continuing to this day. Those who perpetuate this lie have an agenda, and millions who believe it know little to nothing about how even to do the research to prove or disprove it—they just take it at face value. When confronted with facts to the contrary by someone like me, their response will be something like, “All I know is my 401(k) was doing great under Clinton, and it went to hell under Bush.”

The forces at work trying to destroy this country have successfully dragged both major parties further to the left than most people realize. I think if we were all honest, people like Michael Moore and Cindy Sheehan would join the Communist Party.

The Democrats would rename themselves the Socialist Party.

The Republicans would rename themselves the Democratic Party.

The true Conservatives left over from any party would form a new Republican Party.

FDR was truly a Socialist, but I think he would roll over in his grave if he could see Michael Moore next to Jimmy Carter at the Democratic National Convention. Sadly, many out there will either deny that Moore was there, or will claim that he also attended the Republican National Convention. I have heard them say so with my own ears.

People from either side of the aisle will say anything to get elected or re-elected. Yet even after being handed their own heads in the November ’06 election, many Republicans seem to be positively deaf to what we the people really want.

There is something about politics that seems to draw the most fervent misplaced loyalties and drives even reasonable, intelligent people to utterly suspend critical thinking and close their minds to dissenting views, even to hard facts. Politics drives smart people to throw facts and logic out the window. Just as the gravity of a black hole warps the fabric of space and time, politics can warp the fabric of man.

Politics creates for those elected to “serve” the public interest (i.e. those who stand to benefit from control of the public purse strings and from special interest perks), the motivation to lie, cheat, steal, connive, and manipulate. It’s like that old saying about the love of money being the root of all evil (well, almost all evil).

Politics causes people to have short memories and selective memories. They count on us forgetting that the Senator John D. Rockefeller (D) said the following during the buildup to the 2003 Iraq invasion:

As the attacks of September 11 demonstrated, the immense destructiveness of modern technology means we can no longer afford to wait around for a smoking gun.

Politics drives people to say “Bush lied and took us to war!” and to count on us forgetting that Bill Clinton said the following on December 16, 1998:

Heavy as they are, the costs of action must be weighed against the price of inaction. If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors. He will make war on his own people.

And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them.

They say Bush lied, but that when presenting the same information more than four years earlier, Bill Clinton did not lie. Taking action based on information does not make the information itself either true or false. Nor does taking action make the information a LIE, particularly because we only know now after taking such action, that the information was false.

When confronted with this inconsistency, politics drives people to respond with “But Bill Clinton didn’t take us to war!” and they count on us not knowing that there were 30 civilian deaths on the first day of air attacks that Bill Clinton ordered, in addition to many other inconvenient facts.

Politics drives ordinary Americans to blind loyalty to one party, and blind hatred of the other… I cannot comprehend this, especially at a time when we face an unprecedented threat to our very civilization from Islamic fascists who think there is no greater glory than to blow themselves up to kill us, or even to die in a blaze of American firepower.

Politics drives school teachers to refuse to salute the flag, not to participate in the Pledge of Allegiance, and to state in the school newspaper that they do so because they disagree with the President’s decision to invade Iraq.

Politics drives newspaper publishers to print exclusively one-sided content only from certain “journalists”, and from one particular mother of a soldier killed in Iraq, but not from other mothers of soldiers killed in Iraq, and to ignore facts which run counter to their agenda.

Politics drives politicians to invoke the name of revered ex-Presidents as they twist his words, in lies to their constituents about the intentions of a current President. At the same time, politicians from both sides conspire to over-tax we the people, spend the excess, and sell us a bill of goods that it is being kept in a “trust fund.”

Politics drives many Americans to say George W. Bush is “the worst President ever.” Those who believe so should brush up on their history:

Warren G. Harding
Andrew Johnson
James Buchanan

…and especially Franklin Pierce.

Politics drives people to say “The deficit is out of control!” and to count on us not knowing the truth:

The federal government probably ran a deficit of about $250 billion in fiscal year 2006, which ended Sept. 30, the Congressional Budget Office estimated Friday. That's about $10 billion less than the CBO forecast earlier this summer and about $68 billion less than the $318 billion deficit recorded in fiscal 2005 Corporate tax receipts have continued to come in ahead of Expectations.

Politics drives the mother of a son killed in Iraq to write in a comparison of George W. Bush to Adolf Hitler, about traveling back in time to kill the infant Bush.

We have a politician—a prominent Senator and former Presidential candidate openly joking on the Bill Maher show “I could have gone to 1600 Pennsylvania and killed the real bird with one stone.” To this the studio full of sycophants responded with delighted applause and laughter.

To the best of my knowledge, both of these people should have been visited by the Secret Service and arrested for these comments, but they get away with it.

This is not a partisan thing—I would be just as disgusted if someone made a similar joke about murdering Bill Clinton, but to the best of my knowledge, no one has ever done so in such a public manner, on national TV, and in particular not a US Senator and former candidate for the Presidency!

Politics drives Congress to waste the people’s time on senseless and useless endeavors… What is the deal with this non-binding resolution? Doesn’t Congress have some real people’s work to do, like fixing the mess they made with this Pension Protection Act, which is so poorly written because they were in such a hurry to get it through so they could go home last year? Now they’re wasting our time debating just how deeply to bury the knife with which they are stabbing our troops in the back!

What has happened to the America that Charlie Daniels sang about nearly 30 years ago?

I should have started this blog long ago. I spent way too many hours debating in other forums, with people who have simply closed their eyes to anything resembling a fact that runs counter to their beliefs. I also spent too many hours writing letters to editors of “newspapers.” They either never printed such letters, or they didn’t have the courage to print them without a rebuttal next to them full of yet more lies from the “journalist” to which I was responding. They can’t do that here, which is why they are trying their level best to squelch blogs, talk radio, and Fox News.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reading List

 I’ve thought about doing this for some time, and I’m just now getting around to it. This is a list of books I’ve read—mostly in the last few years, but some I read as much as 30 years ago. They’re in no particular order, but just to give some kind of idea where I come from, so to speak, and what interests me.

Sarah: How a Hockey Mom Turned the Political Establishment Upside Down - Kaylene Johnson

The Looming Tower – Lawrence Wright
 
The Cuckoo’s Egg – Cliff Stoll (This is a book I read because it’s about computer forensics, but I had no idea beforehand that it had such a political undercurrent. I could also call it The Education and Rehabilitation of a Berkeley Anti-Military Liberal).

Let Freedom Ring – Sean Hannity

Computer Forensics – Warren G. Kruse II, and Jay G. Heiser

Fahrenheit 451 – Ray Bradbury

Catcher in the Rye – J.D. Salinger

Making Money in Technical Writing – Peter Kent

The Richest Man in Babylon – George S. Clason

What Should I Do With My Life? – P.O. Bronson

On Writing – Stephen King

Leadership Secrets of Attila the Hun – Wess Roberts

A Brief History of Time – Stephen W. Hawking

Blind Man’s Bluff - Sherry Sontag, Christopher Drew, Annette Lawrence Drew

Words That Work – Dr. Frank Luntz

When Worlds Collide - Philip Wylie, Edwin Balmer

After Worlds Collide - Philip Wylie

Danse Macabre – Stephen King

Needful Things – Stephen King

The Stand – Stephen King

The Shining – Stephen King

Four Past Midnight – Stephen King

The Pursuit of Happyness – Chris Gardner

100 People Who Are Screwing up America – Bernard Goldberg

The O’Reilly Factor – Bill O’Reilly

The No Spin Zone – Bill O’Reilly

Your Money or Your Life – Neil Cavuto

Games People Play – Eric Berne

Mission Compromised – Lt. Col. Oliver North

Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo – Capt. Ted W. Lawson

Slander – Ann Coulter

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »